by Rafi Samuels-Schwartz
My great-uncle Sammy was, by all accounts, an actual, honest-to-god, genius. Â
Born to Russian immigrant parents (my great-grandparents) in Minneapolis, Uncle Sammy was the only person I’ve ever known who wrote letters to Albert Einstein, and actually got one back. After earning his MD at the University of Minnesota, he quickly established himself as a world expert in blood disorders. By the mid-1940s, Uncle Sammy was tapped by the federal government to lead a 25 person team at the University of Chicago, secretly investigating the effects of radiation on blood. Project codename: Manhattan. Â
I told you he was a genius. Â
Still, it doesn’t mean he was all that smart.
When I was about 7, I noticed that Uncle Sammy was missing the top half of his right-hand ring finger. It turns out that just because someone helps design an atomic bomb doesn’t mean they understand that, when trying to clear a twig out of a lawnmower, the engine should be turned off first. Â
He used to like to tell a story about how he and his research partner once had to collect blood samples from a bull for some research he was conducting. I don’t know what the blood samples were for, or why he couldn’t wait until the bull was sedated by a professional, but I know the punchline of this adventure by heart: “I quickly learned how to calculate the velocity of my ass over a fence.” That’s my uncle Sammy, the world-class doctor, hauling his tush over a barnyard fence to avoid being gored by an angry bull. Â
Like I said, a genius, but sometimes not all that smart.
And yet…
He raised a huge family: 9 kids, dozens of grandkids, even a few great-grandkids. As THE patriarch for an extended network of nieces, nephews, cousins, foster kids, and other hangers-on, he raised Rabbis, doctors, professors, and dancers. Even more, as an ardent labor-Zionist, dedicated to the state of Israel and the rights of her workers and kibbutzniks, Uncle Sammy may have even helped Israel hone the atomic capabilities the country emphatically denies having. At least, that’s the family legend. Not sure if it’s true, and to be honest, I kind of like it better not knowing.
Frankly, I’m not sure if the bull story actually happened, either. And, that letter back from Einstein? Well, we can’t actually find it. So, while I really hope the lawnmower story is true, that isn’t really the point. See, that’s the thing I’ve learned about geniuses like my Uncle Sammy–they’re larger than life. Everything they do, whether it’s escaping a marauding bull, or smuggling nuclear secrets, is either because they’re brilliant, or in spite of it. Sam Schwartz was the kind of person who, either by virtue of being there, or telling you about it afterwards, gave every moment something special, something more-than-normal. And sure, working on the Manhattan project is nice. And, having a medical test named after him is great, too. But making people feel special just for knowing him? Â
That’s genius.
…
Read more posts from Issue #10: “Geniushood.”
By Rebecca Halpin
Mensa defines genius (or eligibility for membership) as ranking in the top 2% of the population on the IQ test. I most certainly do not consider myself a genius; until 7th grade, I thought Toronto was in Mexico. No doubt, schooling was always important to my family. Good grades were always rewarded with a trip to our restaurant of choice; in my family, all the kids always chose the very traif raw oysters at Pappas Seafood as our reward, that is, until raw shellfish from the Gulf of Mexico were deemed inedible by the FDA.
My parents stressed leadership, which I found in BBYO and NFTY; responsibility, which I found in babysitting and as a camp counselor; as well as any other traits a “good Jewish girl” should have.
Intelligence was no exception. Poor grades and test scores didn’t just disappoint my parents, but me as well. I needed to succeed academically, it was a part of my heritage. At my sister’s high school – which was affectionately nicknamed “Hebrew High” – if you weren’t Jewish or Asian, you didn’t have a chance of getting into the top ten percent. I wanted to be recognized for my hard work.
It wasn’t until years later, after college, when I stopped reading books because they were required and started reading for my own enjoyment, that the thought crossed my mind about joining Mensa. I had heard of it, but nobody I knew was a member. Having thoroughly enjoyed comedian Steve Martin’s first novella, Shopgirl, I soon followed it up with his The Pleasure of My Company, a very funny novel about a highly-neurotic man who takes the Mensa entrance exam only to find out that he has a 2-digit IQ. (Interestingly, the Mensa test doesn’t actually give you your IQ score; it only identifies if you fall into the top 2%). Having spent his whole life convinced he was among the intellectually-elite, he finds himself at the start of a paradigm shift of epic proportions.
I won’t give away the ending, but the idea crossed my mind that I might be interested in taking the admittance IQ test just to see if I could pass. I had always been an excellent test taker. In fact, I was a better tester than I was a student. Growing up, my mother, who was an Educational Diagnostician, used to try out her new tests on me and my siblings. They were easy by comparison to the yearly achievement tests we took at school, and were used to diagnose things like dyslexia, which none of us had. I had done well enough on my PSATs to earn a National Merit Scholarship and had SAT scores that put me at the top of the list to be a tutor.
So I went to the Mensa website, requested to be e-mailed the at-home practice test, and found a cozy little spot to sit down and take my test. I didn’t try terribly hard, but I did the best I could and mailed it off to the organization. Weeks went by without a reply, but it didn’t faze me. It’s not like I expected to get in. Finally, a shiny Mensa-logoed envelope arrived containing a page informing me that my score indicated that I had a great chance of passing the actual test. I signed up for a test date, and a few weeks later, I was sitting in a classroom at Columbia University with a dozen or so other applicants. They weren’t at all what I expected – they were skater guys, ad execs, and artists; there wasn’t a pocket protector to be found.
The proctor told us that by nature of the self-selection process, about 80% of applicants get in to Mensa, giving us a nice little boost before the 3-hour test began. I felt confident when it ended, but I had no idea if I would get in.
It was still a shock when I did! To this day, I still believe that luck played a major factor; the oral/memory section was about Greek theater, a topic I was quite familiar with as a Theater/English double major in college.
Regardless of the reason, I am now a card-carrying member of Mensa. I am reluctant to add “proud” to the previous statement. It’s a topic of frequent debate on the Mensa listserves – will listing my membership on my resume seem snobbish? I wouldn’t list my membership in any other club, so, for the most part, I keep it under wraps. In the meantime, I still make many mistakes; after all, being academically smart doesn’t mean I have common sense. Though hopefully one day I’ll learn to wear my Mensa status as proudly as my Jewish star.
Read more posts from Issue #10: “Geniushood.”
Photo by James Sarmiento, licensed under Creative Commons.
This week we introduce issue #10: “Geniushood”
…

“Geniushood” is not actually a word. Seriously. Go ahead, look it up. We’ll wait.
Told you.
So what is it? And what, you might wonder, does it have to do with being Jewish?
Glad you asked.
Winston Churchill, who many people consider to be a genius in his own right, once said:
“Some people like the Jews, and some do not. But no thoughtful man can deny the fact that they are, beyond any question, the most formidable and the most remarkable race which has appeared in the world.”
Many people think of Albert Einstein first when they think of Jewish genius. And, sure, maybe Churchill had a penchant for the German-Jewish physicist, but we like to think that he had something more than just “E=MC*2″ in mind when he uttered the words above. That’s why, when titling this issue, we needed a word that wasn’t just limited to a high I.Q.; we needed a word that suggested the hard work, the study, and yes, maybe even the natural talent, that Churchill found so impressive in the Jewish people.
So, in the fashion of many literary greats who have come before us, we made one up – not simply genius, but “Geniushood.”
Of course, the suggestion of an inherent Jewish “Geniushood” is a bit of a double-edged sword. On the one hand, the term Ashkenazi Intelligence has its own entry in Wikipedia and the ratio of Jewish Nobel Laureates to Jewish people is eyebrow-crinklingly high. On the other hand, calling Jews inherently smart plays into stereotypes that have gotten us into trouble in the past.
The question of how we found ourselves walking this line between truth and stereotype has many answers. Beyond genealogy, the Jewish people have a long and rich history of appreciating education. At the same time, in the battle of nature versus nurture, the role of the classic, finger-waving Jewish parent cannot be ignored either. A few years ago, New York Magazine took a stab at explaining the prevalence of Jewish intelligence and published an article about why the Jewish community excels. Their professional opinion, citing a lifetime of social segmentation, and in some cases discrimination, is fascinating, but it tells us very little about what we as Jews think of all this fanfare over the alleged size of our brains.
For the next two weeks, Alef will be featuring stories that explore the idea of “Jewish Geniushood.” Is it good? Is it bad? Is it even real? You’ll read stories about certifiable “geniuses” and see what happens when we disappoint our families, who, of course, expect each of us to be “Little Einsteins.” Maybe we’ll confirm Churchill’s theory, and maybe not. But, whatever the outcome, we hope you”ll take the time to strap on your thinking caps and enjoy Issue 10: “Geniushood.”
-Alef
Photo by Foxtongue, licensed under Creative Commons.
“Geniushood” Posts
An Issue of Pride
Not Special
What is a Jewish Intellectual?
The Career Choice
Under Pressure?
Recent Comments